The 30th Conference of Parties (COP30) in Belem was expected to serve as the ‘COP of Implementation’, where aspirations of earlier COPs would translate into tangible outcomes. At the summit, Brazil took the ‘Mutirão’ approach, a traditional practice in which communities come together to work on a common goal. However, it was met with a disconcerting contradiction: the world acknowledged the need for systemic climate action but did not commit to financing, timelines, and frameworks to facilitate it. The COP30 decision text also reflected this disparity, acknowledging for the first time that the world will likely overshoot 1.5°C, yet offering no corrective pathway or ratcheting mechanism to steer action back on course.
Instead, COP30 launched a set of voluntary initiatives, such as the Global Implementation Accelerator and the Belém Mission to 1.5°C, inviting countries to prepare implementation and investment plans. While useful, these initiatives neither constitute binding obligations nor provide a roadmap for fossil fuel transition or deforestation control. Even the ‘Tropical Forests Forever Facility’, announced at COP30, failed to establish a roadmap to halt deforestation.
More About Publication |
|
|---|---|
| Date | 26 November 2025 |
| Type | Op-eds/Interviews/Press Releases |
| Contributor | |
| Publisher | The Wire |
| Related Areas | |
Get in touch with us at
cpe@cstep.in