• Solar field area & storage capacity was varied to assess impact on techno-economic performance of the two solar technologies.
  • PV yielded a minimum LCOE of 0.12 USD/kWh and a CUF of 0.27.
  • s-ORC yielded a minimum LCOE of 0.19 USD/kWh, with a CUF of 0.56. LCOE of PV, for a similar CUF is 0.26 USD/kWh.
  • Results evince that s-ORC potentially offers reliable decentralized power supply due to cost-effectiveness of thermal storage.
Types
Journal Articles
Caption
Techno-economic comparison of solar organic Rankine cycle (ORC) and photovoltaic (PV) systems with energy storage
Upload Documentations
Choose Verticals
From Date
To Date
status
Live
Image
Published by
Renewable Energy
Contributors(Team & Author)
Description (Below Key Messages)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.06.107

(*Vikas R. Patil, Vijay Irappa Biradar, R. Shreyas, Pardeep Garg, and Matthew S. Orosz are other authors of this paper.)

 

Publication Detail Header Image
Meta Title
Techno-economic comparison of solar organic Rankine cycle (ORC) and photovoltaic (PV) systems
Meta Description
Techno-economic comparison of solar organic Rankine cycle (ORC) and photovoltaic (PV) systems
Meta Keyword
Techno-economic comparison of solar organic Rankine cycle (ORC) and photovoltaic (PV) systems